{"id":5013,"date":"2024-03-05T07:50:00","date_gmt":"2024-03-05T06:50:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/foastek.fr\/?p=5013"},"modified":"2024-03-04T18:51:59","modified_gmt":"2024-03-04T17:51:59","slug":"une-difference-de-remuneration-de-10-cts-heure-peut-etre-discriminatoire","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/foastek.fr\/?p=5013","title":{"rendered":"Une diff\u00e9rence de r\u00e9mun\u00e9ration de 10 cts \/ heure peut \u00eatre discriminatoire"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Rappel sur l\u2019\u00e9galit\u00e9 des r\u00e9mun\u00e9rations<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

L\u2019employeur doit assurer l\u2019\u00e9galit\u00e9 de r\u00e9mun\u00e9ration entre tous les salari\u00e9s de l\u2019un ou l\u2019autre sexe plac\u00e9s dans une situation identique. C\u2019est le principe, souvent invoqu\u00e9 dans les contentieux, \u00ab \u00e0 travail \u00e9gal, salaire \u00e9gal \u00bb (cass. soc. 29 octobre 1996, n\u00b0 92-43680, BC V n\u00b0 359 ; cass. soc. 15 d\u00e9cembre 1998, n\u00b0 95-43630, BC V n\u00b0 551). Pour que ce principe puisse jouer, il faut bien entendu que les situations soient comparables.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Affaire<\/span><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

Un employeur avait \u00e9t\u00e9 condamn\u00e9 \u00e0 payer \u00e0 un salari\u00e9, reconnu travailleur handicap\u00e9, des dommages-int\u00e9r\u00eats pour discrimination salariale.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

L\u2019employeur avait tent\u00e9 de justifier la diff\u00e9rence de traitement entre les deux salari\u00e9s par la qualit\u00e9 de r\u00e9f\u00e9rent technique […], ce que n\u2019\u00e9tait pas le salari\u00e9 s\u2019estimant discrimin\u00e9. Selon l\u2019employeur, la cour d\u2019appel n\u2019avait pas constat\u00e9 que la discrimination invoqu\u00e9e \u00e9tait pr\u00e9sum\u00e9e du fait du handicap du salari\u00e9.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

La cour d\u2019appel a estim\u00e9 que l’employeur n’\u00e9tablissait pas que le salari\u00e9, dont la r\u00e9mun\u00e9ration \u00e9tait sup\u00e9rieure (de 10 cts\/heure) \u00e0 celle du salari\u00e9 en situation de handicap, avait la qualit\u00e9 de r\u00e9f\u00e9rent qui justifierait la diff\u00e9rence de traitement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

La Cour de cassation n’a pas retenu les arguments de l\u2019employeur. Elle repart des faits soulev\u00e9s par la cour d’appel qui, apr\u00e8s avoir relev\u00e9 que le salari\u00e9 se plaignait d’une discrimination salariale fond\u00e9e sur sa situation de travailleur handicap\u00e9, a constat\u00e9 que sa r\u00e9mun\u00e9ration \u00e9tait inf\u00e9rieure \u00e0 celle de son coll\u00e8gue de travail accomplissant le m\u00eame travail, faisant ainsi ressortir que cet \u00e9l\u00e9ment laissait pr\u00e9sumer l’existence d’une discrimination.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

📌 Cass. soc. 14 f\u00e9vrier 2024, n\u00b0 22-10513 D<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rappel sur l\u2019\u00e9galit\u00e9 des r\u00e9mun\u00e9rations L\u2019employeur doit assurer l\u2019\u00e9galit\u00e9 de r\u00e9mun\u00e9ration entre tous les salari\u00e9s de l\u2019un ou l\u2019autre sexe plac\u00e9s dans une situation identique. […]<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4350,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"h5ap_radio_sources":[],"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[2,10],"tags":[246,61],"class_list":["post-5013","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-accueil","category-vos-droits","tag-discrimination","tag-salaire"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/foastek.fr\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/palais_justice.jpg?fit=805%2C453&ssl=1","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p77E1E-1iR","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/foastek.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5013","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/foastek.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/foastek.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foastek.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foastek.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5013"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/foastek.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5013\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5014,"href":"https:\/\/foastek.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5013\/revisions\/5014"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foastek.fr\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/4350"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/foastek.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5013"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foastek.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5013"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/foastek.fr\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5013"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}